Quantcast

Walmart GV Shortening.

SoapMakingForum

Help Support SoapMakingForum:

Saby

Member
Joined
May 20, 2019
Messages
10
Reaction score
3
Location
Columbus
I was considering using the Walmart GV Shortening, tallow, palm from Walmart, but (Great Value Prepared from Meat Fats & Vegetable Oils Shortening) there is no palm in the ingredients list.

Ingredients:
BEEF TALLOW, LARD, HYDROGENATED BEEF TALLOW, SOYBEAN OIL, MONO- AND DIGLYCERIDES, BHA AND BT ADDED TO HELP PROTECT FLAVOR.

Is it a new formula? Can I still run it through SoapCalc?
Thank you.
 

lsg

Staff member
Admin
Moderator
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Messages
13,869
Reaction score
5,334
The listing in SoapCalc for Walmart GV shortening appears to be for a formula which contains palm oil.
 

earlene

Grandmother & Soaper
Lifetime Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2016
Messages
7,493
Reaction score
7,109
Location
Western Illinois, USA
The order of the ingredients gives a clue.
Ingredients: BEEF TALLOW, LARD, HYDROGENATED BEEF TALLOW, SOYBEAN OIL, MONO- AND DIGLYCERIDES, BHA AND BT ADDED TO HELP PROTECT FLAVOR.

I would guestimate this mix at (more or less): 60% Tallow (total of beef tallow+hydrogenated beef tallow); 20% Lard; 20% Soy. Because the soy can be equal to, but not higher than the amount of Lard. The Hydrogenated beef tallow may also be equal to the amount of lard, but probably isn't since it is ordered after the Lard, but both tallows together have to add up to the bulk of the product. Actually all could be equal in percentage, in which case, all would be 25% (given the order of listing), but it really makes no sense to put lard before beef tallow, IMO, if that were the case. If I was listing ingredients, I would list the two beef tallows together. But that is just me and my logic. It would not be required.

Then the individual SAP values for the ingredients also gives a clue.
Beef Tallow SAP (for NaOH): 0.140 - 0.143
Lard SAP (for NaOH): 0.138 - 0.141
Soy SAP (for NaOH): 0.135 - 0.137
I use a range because different resources give different numbers, so I included what I found.

With varying mixes of percentages keeping the order in mind the amount of lye needed for a 500 g batch varies from 70.3 grams (if all are at 25%) to 70.5 grams (with my 60-20-20 percentages are correct). I would say it's such a small difference that I'd feel safe using the Beef tallow setting with a 3% SF setting or even the Lard setting with a 0% SF setting.

You won't necessarily get all the correct other numbers if you do it that way, but if that is your goal, you'd have to learn what those numbers are for hydrogenated beef tallow. I could not find that information. But the SAP value would still be within the same range as the non-hydrogenated beef tallow.

Or what I would do if it were me, is I'd plug the oils in as I guestimated them and make a test batch with 310 grams of oils, with a 2:1 oil to water ratio = [33.33% Lye] concentration and 0% SF which would give me a total batch size of ~450 grams (or about one pound of soap), which is a nice test size batch.

That's what I come up with, and that's how I'd test this product at first. Then I'd also at the same time, make the same recipe using the ingredients individually following the exact same recipe I created and compare the two soaps for similarities or differences. The only difference would be that I would color them differently so I could tell them apart.
 

Saby

Member
Joined
May 20, 2019
Messages
10
Reaction score
3
Location
Columbus
The order of the ingredients gives a clue.
Ingredients: BEEF TALLOW, LARD, HYDROGENATED BEEF TALLOW, SOYBEAN OIL, MONO- AND DIGLYCERIDES, BHA AND BT ADDED TO HELP PROTECT FLAVOR.

I would guestimate this mix at (more or less): 60% Tallow (total of beef tallow+hydrogenated beef tallow); 20% Lard; 20% Soy. Because the soy can be equal to, but not higher than the amount of Lard. The Hydrogenated beef tallow may also be equal to the amount of lard, but probably isn't since it is ordered after the Lard, but both tallows together have to add up to the bulk of the product. Actually all could be equal in percentage, in which case, all would be 25% (given the order of listing), but it really makes no sense to put lard before beef tallow, IMO, if that were the case. If I was listing ingredients, I would list the two beef tallows together. But that is just me and my logic. It would not be required.

Then the individual SAP values for the ingredients also gives a clue.
Beef Tallow SAP (for NaOH): 0.140 - 0.143
Lard SAP (for NaOH): 0.138 - 0.141
Soy SAP (for NaOH): 0.135 - 0.137
I use a range because different resources give different numbers, so I included what I found.

With varying mixes of percentages keeping the order in mind the amount of lye needed for a 500 g batch varies from 70.3 grams (if all are at 25%) to 70.5 grams (with my 60-20-20 percentages are correct). I would say it's such a small difference that I'd feel safe using the Beef tallow setting with a 3% SF setting or even the Lard setting with a 0% SF setting.

You won't necessarily get all the correct other numbers if you do it that way, but if that is your goal, you'd have to learn what those numbers are for hydrogenated beef tallow. I could not find that information. But the SAP value would still be within the same range as the non-hydrogenated beef tallow.

Or what I would do if it were me, is I'd plug the oils in as I guestimated them and make a test batch with 310 grams of oils, with a 2:1 oil to water ratio = [33.33% Lye] concentration and 0% SF which would give me a total batch size of ~450 grams (or about one pound of soap), which is a nice test size batch.

That's what I come up with, and that's how I'd test this product at first. Then I'd also at the same time, make the same recipe using the ingredients individually following the exact same recipe I created and compare the two soaps for similarities or differences. The only difference would be that I would color them differently so I could tell them apart.
Thank you. I will use Beef tallow setting with a 3% SF.
 

Steve85569

SPONSOR
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2015
Messages
1,908
Reaction score
2,085
Location
North East Oregon, USA
For the animal version of GV shortening I use the SAP value for lard.
There are usually two different GV shortenings in WalMart here. One is animal and the other has palm in it.
 

Saby

Member
Joined
May 20, 2019
Messages
10
Reaction score
3
Location
Columbus
For the animal version of GV shortening I use the SAP value for lard.
There are usually two different GV shortenings in WalMart here. One is animal and the other has palm in it.
What is your SF setting with lard?
 

Mobjack Bay

Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2019
Messages
2,566
Reaction score
4,130
Location
Virginia
I finally decided to give tallow a try when I found this shortening at a regional Walmart. At first I thought it was the one with palm, but when I got home I realized it is tallow, lard and soybean oil. Soybean oil always makes me a little nervous, which is what brought me to this thread.

After reading @earlene ‘s post above, it occurred to me that additional information given on the can for this product should be useful for approximating the composition.

The can lists the distribution of fats in an 11 g serving as follows:

saturated = 4.5 g
trans = 0.5 g
monounsaturated = 4 g
polyunsaturated = 1 g

This adds up to 10 g of fat, not 11. I don’t know how to account for that missing gram of fat, so I just ignored it and set my total fat to 10 g for further calculation. Thus, the mixture of tallow, lard and soybean oil should have 45% saturated, 5% trans, 40% monounsaturated and 10% polyunsaturated. The trans fat could be anything, but with hydrogenated tallow in the ingredient list, I assumed the trans fat is of a saturated fat. If saturated = Lauric + myristic + stearic + palmitic + trans; monounsaturated = oleic; and polyunsaturated = linoleic + linolenic, a close fit using the SMF calculator is as follows:

tallow = 51%
lard = 39%
soybean oil = 10%

which yields the following FA profile:

saturated = 47%
monounsaturated = 39%
polyunsaturated = 10%

This accounts for only 96% of the fatty acids. As I understand it, this is because the calculators don’t include every type of FA that can be present in the oils. Close enough, I think.

A composition of tallow (40%), lard (39%), hydrogenated tallow (11%) and soybean oil (10%) would be consistent with the order of ingredients listed on the can. The sap for the mixture I estimated is 0.141 according to the SMF calculator, which returns 141.35 g of lye needed for 1000 g of oils. Although my percentages vary a bit from those estimated by Earlene, in the end, the sap estimate is the same :). And happily, the polyunsaturated (linoleic +linolenic) percentage is in a range I can deal with.

ETA: according to the SMF calculator, the Walmart tallow/palm blend has 54% saturated, 37% monounsaturated and 7% polyunsaturated fats and a NaOH SAP of .141. Until the calculator is updated, I will probably use that blend as a proxy for the tallow/lard blend. The SAP should be fine, but I anticipate that the calculated recipe will be off a bit on the hardness and longevity. If my calculations are close, the soap will be slightly softer and less long lasting due mostly to lower percentages of palmitic FA in the tallow/lard blend compared with the tallow/palm blend.
 
Last edited:

Mobjack Bay

Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2019
Messages
2,566
Reaction score
4,130
Location
Virginia
So it turns out that the can I bought does not give a full breakdown of the fats. I got the information from a photo of the can on the website. I’m posting it here for reference.

33F99BFD-AA84-4912-8217-C1F7E50072C2.jpeg
 

Latest posts

Top