I've always used the GV shortening SAP in the calcs regardless if I use the tallow or vegetable versions. I had to do some Google search to jog my memory why I thought it was ok, but here's what I came up with:
Tallow shortening has Tallow, Lard, and Soybean oil (there's also hydrogenated tallow, which I didn't think affected the SAP value as it wasn't in the calc)
Vegetable shortening has Soybean and Palm (again with hydrogenated Palm listed separately but in calc it has the same SAP)
Looking at the SAP values themselves: Tallow .143, Lard .141, Palm .142 and Soy .136
With the SAP values all being so close between tallow/lard/palm, the micro variance at small batch level really isn't going to add up to much. The wild card is more likely if the percentage of soy is different between the two shortenings, but my thinking is that they're probably close enough that it doesn't matter. Maybe a more sciencey soapmaker will have a different perspective, which I look forward to learning from.
I make 800g (oil weight) batches for teaching soap classes and haven't had issues with a soap being lye heavy or soft. I also use a lower SF (3%) as this soap tends to be a bit scummy at higher SF, and it pushes the shelf life a bit. I had issues with DOS showing up at 14 months, but the lower SF at least allows us to use up the soap before DOS shows up.
Just realized that I should also clarify that the recipe I use for classes is 40% shortening, 35% OO, 20% CO and 5% castor. (I offer the option to use lard instead of shortening for those who prefer to avoid soy, but shortening is an affordable option that is accessible in my area... sorry, that's OT but thought I would mention it.)